高级检索
    黄久红, 张秀珍. 泰州市公共场所卫生质量现状分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2014, 4(3): 269-271.
    引用本文: 黄久红, 张秀珍. 泰州市公共场所卫生质量现状分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2014, 4(3): 269-271.
    shu
    Huang Jiuhong, Zhang Xiuzhen. Hygienic Quality in Public Places in Taizhou City[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2014, 4(3): 269-271.
    Citation: Huang Jiuhong, Zhang Xiuzhen. Hygienic Quality in Public Places in Taizhou City[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2014, 4(3): 269-271.
    shu

    泰州市公共场所卫生质量现状分析

    Hygienic Quality in Public Places in Taizhou City

      摘要
    • 摘要:
      目的 了解泰州市公共场所卫生现状, 为今后开展卫生监测提供依据。
      方法 依据《公共场所卫生监测技术规范》(GB/T 17220-1998) 进行检测。
      结果 2009-2011年共监测370家公共场所公共用品2 711份, 合格1 990份, 合格率73.41%, 3年合格率分别为77.23%、68.69%、73.74%。共监测环境空气6 837项次, 合格6 622项次, 项次合格率96.86%, 3年项次合格率分别为98.09%、97.89%、95.06%。不同类型公共场所公共用品合格率分别为旅店业85.57%、文化娱乐场所59.41%、公共浴室67.82%、理发店(美容店)70.40%。不同类型公共场所室内环境空气项次合格率分别为旅店业98.34%、文化娱乐场所98.74%、公共浴室94.15%、理发店(美容店)96.60%、商场(店)98.93%。
      结论 泰州市公共场所室内环境空气合格率较高, 公共用品合格率偏低。应进一步加强公共场所监管力度, 提高整体卫生质量, 保障人民群众身体健康。

       

      Abstract:
      Objectives To master the current hygienic state of public places in Taizhou city.
      Methods Samples were collected and tested and the pass rates were analyzed according to Surveillance Technical Standard of Public Places (GB/T 17220-1998).
      Results A total of 2711 samples from 370 public places were collected and tested in 2009-2011, among which, 1990 samples (73.41%) were qualified, the qualification rates in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were 77.23%, 68.69%, and 73.74%, respectively. As for the qualification of air samples, 6 622 of 6837 (96.86%) air samples were qualified, the qualification rates in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were 98.09%, 97.89% and 95.06%, respectively. The qualification rates of public articles in hotel, entertainment place, public bath room and barbershop (beauty parlor) were 85.57%, 59.41%, 67.82% and 70.40%, respectively.The qualification rates of indoor air in different public places were 98.34% (in hotel), 98.74% (in entertainment places), 94.15% (in public bath room), 96.60% (in barbershop or beauty parlor) and 98.93% (in mall).
      Conclusions The pass rate of indoor air in Taizhou city was rather high. On the contrary, the pass rate of public articles was low. Supervision on public places should be strengthened in order to improve the quality of public places and protect the health of customers and staffs.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(12)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回