高级检索
    刘利亚, 周贻兵, 李磊, 潘川, 张卫国. 酚醛树脂和脲醛树脂板材对室内装修甲醛暴露水平分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2014, 4(6): 569-571, 575.
    引用本文: 刘利亚, 周贻兵, 李磊, 潘川, 张卫国. 酚醛树脂和脲醛树脂板材对室内装修甲醛暴露水平分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2014, 4(6): 569-571, 575.
    shu
    Liu Liya, Zhou Yibing, Li Lei, Pan Chuan, Zhang Weiguo. Analysis on Level of Formaldehyde Exposure to Phenolic Resin Material and Urea Formaldehyde Resin Material in Housing Renovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2014, 4(6): 569-571, 575.
    Citation: Liu Liya, Zhou Yibing, Li Lei, Pan Chuan, Zhang Weiguo. Analysis on Level of Formaldehyde Exposure to Phenolic Resin Material and Urea Formaldehyde Resin Material in Housing Renovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2014, 4(6): 569-571, 575.
    shu

    酚醛树脂和脲醛树脂板材对室内装修甲醛暴露水平分析

    Analysis on Level of Formaldehyde Exposure to Phenolic Resin Material and Urea Formaldehyde Resin Material in Housing Renovation

      摘要
    • 摘要:
      目的  探讨以酚醛树脂和脲醛树脂为胶粘剂的人造板材装修后室内甲醛的暴露水平。
      方法  根据装修时使用人造板材种类分成酚醛树脂板材组 (A组)、脲醛树脂酚醛树脂板材混合组 (B组) 和脲醛树脂板材组 (C组), 在装修完工后15 d内完成第1次监测, 以后每月对应时间监测1次, 共7次。甲醛测定方法为《居住区大气中甲醛卫生检验标准方法分光光度法》(GB/T16129-1995)。
      结果  A组 (0.084±0.040 mg/m3) 与B组 (0.195±0.278 mg/m3) 和C组 (0.494±0.559mg/m3) 经t检验差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.05);C组至第7次监测 (183 d) 甲醛浓度仍处于较高水平 (0.118±0.14 mg/m3); B组和A组分别在第5次 (122 d) 和第3次 (60 d) 室内甲醛降低到国家标准值以下。
      结论  装修时大量使用脲醛树脂板材可引起室内甲醛暴露水平的升高。

       

      Abstract:
      Objectives  To discuss the level of formaldehyde exposure in housing renovation while using phenolic resin material and urea formaldehyde resin material as adhesives.
      Methods  Based on the kinds of adhesive materials used, the study was classified into three groups:phenolic resin (group A), mixed urea formaldehyde resin and phenolic resin (group B), and urea formaldehyde resin (group C). The monitoring started from the 15th day after the renovation being completed and monitored every month for 7 times. The concentration of formaldehyde was determined by spectrophotometry (GB/T 16129-1995).
      Results  The Results of group A (0.084±0.040 mg/m3), group B (0.195±0.278 mg/m3) and group C (0.494±0.559 mg/m3) were significantly different by t-test (P < 0.05). The level of formaldehyde in group C was higher on the seventh monitoring day (183 days; 0.118±0.14 mg/m3); the level of formaldehyde in group A and group B came to the national standards at 122 and 60 days after renovation, respectively.
      Conclusions  Excessively using urea formaldehyde resin material as adhesives could cause a higher level of formaldehyde exposure.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(8)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回