董兵, 范文嘉, 朱会卷, 张卫强, 罗嵩. 2011年化妆品卫生化学检测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2012, 2(3): 126-127, 130.
    引用本文: 董兵, 范文嘉, 朱会卷, 张卫强, 罗嵩. 2011年化妆品卫生化学检测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2012, 2(3): 126-127, 130.
    Dong Bing, Fan Wenjia, Zhu Huijuan, Zhang Weiqiang, Luo Song. Analysis on the Results of Sanitary Chemicals in Cosmetics Determined in 2011[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2012, 2(3): 126-127, 130.
    Citation: Dong Bing, Fan Wenjia, Zhu Huijuan, Zhang Weiqiang, Luo Song. Analysis on the Results of Sanitary Chemicals in Cosmetics Determined in 2011[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2012, 2(3): 126-127, 130.

    2011年化妆品卫生化学检测结果分析

    Analysis on the Results of Sanitary Chemicals in Cosmetics Determined in 2011

    • 摘要:
      目的 了解2011年化妆品卫生化学检测结果。
      方法 对2011年检测的372份化妆品的卫生化学检测结果进行统计分析。
      结果 化妆品中铅、砷、pH、性激素、α-羟基酸、巯基乙酸、氢醌、苯酚、甲醛、抗生素、甲硝唑、斑蝥、氮芥含量指标均符合《化妆品卫生规范》 (2007年版)的要求。226份样品中汞含量合格的有225份,合格率为99.6%; 16份样品中甲醇含量合格的有14份,合格率为87.5%;检测的44份防晒剂样品中有42份样品合格,合格率为95.5%;检测的23份样品有22份样品合格,合格率为95.7%。
      结论 2011年化妆品卫生化学检测总体合格率较高,但仍然存在部分样品汞、甲醇含量超标,防晒剂、染发剂与标注的配方不符等问题。

       

      Abstract:
      Objectives To analyze the results of sanitary chemicals in cosmetics determined in 2011.
      Methods The results of sanitary chemicals in 372 cosmetic samples were analyzed statistically.
      Results Contents of plumbum, arsenic, pH, sexual hormones, α-hydroxy acid, thioglycollic acid, hydroquinone, phenol, formaldehyde, antibiotics, metronidazole, cantharidin and chlormethine accorded with the standards of Hygienic Standard for Cosmetics (2007). Hydrargyrum contents in 225 of 226 tested samples were qualified (99.6%). Methanol contents in 14 of 16 tested samples were qualified (87.5%). UV filters in 42 of 44 tested samples were qualified (95.5%), except two unqualified samples not matching the formula. Hair dyes in 22 of 23 tested samples were qualified (95.7%), except one unqualified sample not matching the formula.
      Conclusion The total qualified rate of chemicals in cosmetics examined in 2011 was quite high, but existing the problem of excessive amount of hydrargyrum, methanol and mismatching the formula.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回