重庆市不同热浪定义下中暑风险的比较研究

    Comparison of Heatstroke risk under different heat wave definitions in Chongqing, China

    • 摘要:
      目的 探索适用于重庆市中暑风险评估的热浪定义并识别敏感人群。
      方法 收集2014-2019年5-9月重庆市中暑报告病例及气象数据, 采用分段回归模型、观察/预期分析及分布滞后非线性模型, 确定导致中暑的热浪温度阈值。基于"阈值+持续时间"定义热浪, 进一步分析不同热浪定义下的滞后效应与非线性特征, 通过比较不同定义筛选最适定义, 并据此识别热浪敏感人群。
      结果 日最高温度与日中暑人数呈非线性正相关关系, 当日最高温度超过34.5℃时, 中暑人数会显著增加。不同定义的热浪均可显著增加中暑风险, 热浪发生当日效应最强, 且可持续1 d。温度超过34.5℃且持续时间2 d以上的热浪定义的Q-AIC值最小(347.15), 为最适热浪定义; 在此热浪定义下, 总人群lag01 d的CRR值为6.74(95%CI: 5.18~8.77), 不同性别和年龄别人群的中暑风险均有统计学意义, 但无性别和年龄差异。
      结论 中暑的风险识别采用计算温度阈值定义热浪的方法可能更适宜; 热浪环境暴露下, 人群普遍存在中暑风险。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore a suitable heat wave definition for assessing heatstroke risk in Chongqing, China, and to identify vulnerable populations.
      Methods Data on reported heatstroke cases and meteorological variables in Chongqing from May to September between 2014 and 2019 were collected.Segmented regression models, observed/expected analysis, and distributed lag non-linear models were applied to determine the temperature thresholds for heat waves leading to heatstroke.Heat waves were defined based on threshold and duration, and the lagged effects and non-linear characteristics under different definitions were analyzed.The most suitable heatwave definition was selected by comparing different definitions, and vulnerable populations were identified accordingly.
      Results Daily maximum temperature was non-linearly and positively associated with daily heatstroke cases.When the daily maximum temperature exceeded 34.5℃, heatstroke cases increased significantly.All heat waves with different definitions significantly elevated heatstroke risk, with the strongest effect observed on the day of heat wave occurrence, lasting for 1 day.A heat wave defined by a temperature exceeding 34.5℃ for ≥2 consecutive days had the lowest Q-AIC value of 347.15, representing the optimal definition.Under this heat wave definition, the cumulative relative risk value for lag01 days was 6.74(95% confidence interval: 5.18-8.77) for the total population.All heatstroke risk estimated were statistically significant across sex-and age-specific subgroups.However, no significant differences in heatstroke risk were found by sex or age.
      Conclusion Defining heat waves using calculated temperature thresholds is suitable for heatstroke risk identification.Under heat wave exposure, the risk of heatstroke is present across various populations.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回