2023年江苏省疾控机构公共场所卫生监测能力现状调查

    Investigation on the status quo of public place health surveillance capacity of centers for disease control and prevention in Jiangsu Province, China, 2023

    • 摘要:
      目的 了解2023年江苏省各级疾控机构公共场所卫生监测能力现状,分析存在的问题及其原因。
      方法 于2023年6月,采用普查的方式,问卷调查江苏省所有市级和县级疾控机构公共场所卫生监测能力(人员配置、指标检测能力及其计量认证通过率)现状,并对不同级别、不同地区疾控机构进行比较分析。
      结果 调查覆盖江苏省全省13个设区市,95个县(市、区)。共回收疾病预防控制机构调查问卷111份,其中市级13份,县级98份;调查内容涵盖人员队伍状况和实验室检测能力5大类31项检测指标。在人员配置方面,市级疾控机构环境卫生岗位设置以专职为主,县级以兼职为主。31项检测指标中,以市级为单位,13家市级总指标计量认证通过率为86.1%(347/403),以县级为单位,98家县级总指标计量认证通过率为51.2%(1 555/3 038);在计量认证通过率方面,市级疾控机构高于县级。在具备检测能力且通过计量认证指标监测能力方面,室内空气PM2.5等8项;公共用品用具pH值等2项;游泳池水、浸脚池水及沐浴水浊度等5项指标监测能力在不同级别疾控机构之间存在差异(χ2为3.87~42.05,P<0.05)。不同地区疾控机构在31项检测指标中,室内空气类氨和集中空调通风系统冷却水及沐浴水类嗜肺军团菌在不同地区疾控机构之间存在差异(χ2分别为8.81和6.39,P<0.05)。监测能力整体评估显示,市级疾控机构公共场所卫生监测能力普遍高于县级,且苏中地区监测能力超过苏南和苏北地区。
      结论 按监测能力综合评估,江苏省县级疾控机构公共场所监测能力总体较低,不同级别疾控机构中市级在人员配置及卫生监测能力上均高于县级,不同地区疾控机构在人员配置及卫生监测能力上存在地区差异,苏北地区以年轻人为主,苏中地区监测能力超过苏南和苏北地区。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the current situation of public place health surveillance capacity of centers for disease control and prevention (CDCs) at all levels in Jiangsu Province, China, 2023, and to analyze the existing problems and causes.
      Methods In June 2023, the current situation of public place health surveillance capacity of all city- and county-level CDCs in Jiangsu Province was investigated using a questionnaire survey regarding personnel allocation, indicator detection ability, and metrological certification pass rate. The CDCs at different levels and regions were compared and analyzed.
      Results The survey covered 13 cities with districts and 95 counties (county-level cities and districts). A total of 111 questionnaires were recovered from CDCs, including 13 from city-level CDCs and 98 from county-level CDCs. The survey covered the status of the workforce and laboratory testing capacity for 31 indicators in 5 categories. In terms of personnel allocation, the environmental health posts in city-level CDCs were mainly full-time, and these posts in county-level CDCs were mainly part-time. Of the 31 testing indicators, the overall metrology certification pass rate was 86.1% (347/403) for the 13 CDCs at the city level and 51.2% (1 555/3 038) for the 98 CDCs at the county level. In terms of having the ability to detect and monitor through metrological certification, the certification pass rate was higher for CDCs at the city level compared with the CDCs at the county level. There were significant differences between CDCs at different levels in 8 indicators of indoor air such as PM2.5, 2 indicators of public goods such as pH, and 5 indicators of swimming pool water, foot pool water, and bath water such as turbidity (the range of χ2 values from 3.87 to 42.05, P < 0.05). Among the 31 indicators determined by CDCs in different regions, there were significant differences in ammonia in indoor air and Legionella pneumophila in central air conditioning cooling water and bath water (χ2 were 8.81 and 6.39, P < 0.05). The overall assessment of surveillance capacity showed that the public place surveillance capacity of CDCs at the city level was generally higher than CDCs at the county level, and the surveillance capacity was higher in CDCs in central Jiangsu than in those in southern and northern Jiangsu.
      Conclusion According to the comprehensive assessment of surveillance capacity, the public place surveillance capacity of county-level CDCs in Jiangsu Province was generally low. The personnel allocation and health surveillance capacity of city-level CDCs were higher than those of county-level CDCs. There were differences in personnel allocation and health surveillance capacity of CDCs in different regions. The CDCs in northern Jiangsu were dominated by young staff, and the surveillance capacity of CDCs in central Jiangsu was higher than that of CDCs in southern and northern Jiangsu.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回