何文鑫, 付俊杰, 何加芬, 卢飞豹, 徐岷, 江文斌. 2016—2020年江西省城市饮用水水质监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(11): 815-820. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.11.008
    引用本文: 何文鑫, 付俊杰, 何加芬, 卢飞豹, 徐岷, 江文斌. 2016—2020年江西省城市饮用水水质监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(11): 815-820. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.11.008
    HE Wen-xin, FU Jun-jie, HE Jia-fen, LU Fei-bao, XU Min, JIANG Wen-bin. Monitoring results of urban drinking water quality in Jiangxi Province, China, 2016—2020[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(11): 815-820. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.11.008
    Citation: HE Wen-xin, FU Jun-jie, HE Jia-fen, LU Fei-bao, XU Min, JIANG Wen-bin. Monitoring results of urban drinking water quality in Jiangxi Province, China, 2016—2020[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(11): 815-820. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.11.008

    2016—2020年江西省城市饮用水水质监测结果分析

    Monitoring results of urban drinking water quality in Jiangxi Province, China, 2016—2020

    • 摘要:
      目的 了解2016 — 2020年江西省城市饮用水水质基本状况和变化趋势。
      方法 2016 — 2020年在江西省11个设区市、98~100个区县共1 439个监测点开展水质监测,涵盖市政集中式供水和自建设施集中式供水的出厂水、末梢水,以及二次供水,每年的丰水期和枯水期各监测一次。分别依据《生活饮用水标准检验方法》(GB/T 5750-2006)、《生活饮用水卫生标准》(GB 5749-2006)进行水质的检测和评价。
      结果 2016 — 2020年江西省城市饮用水总达标率达92.47%,各年达标率呈逐年上升趋势(χ趋势2=322.92,P < 0.05);丰、枯水期总达标率差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.81,P > 0.05);市政集中式供水达标率>自建设施集中式供水,差异有统计学意义(χ2=290.79,P < 0.05);市政集中式供水的末梢水达标率>出厂水>二次供水,差异有统计学意义(χ2=164.25,P < 0.05);自建设施集中式供水的出厂水和末梢水达标率差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.30,P > 0.05);地表水源和地下水源的水质达标率差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.03,P < 0.05),地下水源水样锰和游离氯达标率均低于地表水源,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。经供水单位混凝、沉淀、过滤、消毒处理和仅消毒处理的水样达标率高于沉淀过滤处理、不处理水样,差异有统计学意义(调整后P < 0.05)。微生物指标和消毒剂指标为影响江西省城市饮用水质量的主要因素。
      结论 江西省城市生活饮用水达标率呈逐年上升趋势,但仍需加强自建设施集中式供水和二次供水的卫生监管,强化水质处理,做好水源消毒净化工作,重点关注微生物指标及消毒剂指标,防范介水传染病的发生。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the basic situation and changing trend of urban drinking water quality in Jiangxi Province, China, in 2016-2020, and to provide a basis for strengthening drinking water safety management.
      Methods From 2016 to 2020, water quality monitoring was conducted in 1439 monitoring sites in 11 district-level cities and 98-100 districts and counties in Jiangxi Province, which covered the finished water and terminal water from municipal centralized water supply and centralized water supply with self-built facilities, as well as secondary water supply. Water samples were collected twice a year in wet season and dry season, respectively. Water quality was detected and evaluated according to the Standard Examination Method for Drinking Water (GB/T 5750-2006) and the Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749-2006), respectively.
      Results From 2016 to 2020, the overall qualified rate of samples was 92.47% for urban drinking water in Jiangxi Province, with a gradual increase year by year (χtrend2=322.92, P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the overall qualified rates of water samples between the wet season and the dry season (χ2=3.81, P >0.05). Water samples had a significantly higher qualified rates in municipal centralized water supply than those in centralized water supply with self-built facilities (χ2=290.79, P < 0.05). For municipal centralized water supply, terminal water had the highest qualified rate, followed by finished water and secondary water supply(χ2=164.25, P < 0.05), while for centralized water supply with self-built facilities, there was no significant difference in the rate of reaching the standard between finished water and terminal water (χ2=1.30, P >0.05). There was a significant difference in the qualified rates between surface water source and underground water source (χ2=9.03, P < 0.05), and the qualified rates of manganese and free chlorine of samples from underground water source were significantly lower than those from surface water source (P < 0.05). The water samples treated with coagulation, precipitation, filtration, and disinfection and those treated with disinfection only by water supply units had significantly higher qualified rates than those treated with precipitation and filtration or without any treatment (P < 0.05 after adjustment). Microbiological indicators and disinfectant indicators were the main influencing factors for urban drinking water quality in Jiangxi Province.
      Conclusion There is a gradual increase in the rate of reaching the standard for urban drinking water in Jiangxi Province, while it is still necessary to strengthen the sanitation supervision of centralized water supply through self-built facilities and secondary water supply, enhance water quality treatment, and emphasize water source disinfection and purification, with a focus on microbiological indicators and disinfectant indicators, so as to prevent water-borne infectious diseases.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回