吉秀亮, 杨君胜, 谢晓媛, 郭学斌. 2021年西宁市公共场所健康危害因素监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(10): 731-735, 756. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.10.005
    引用本文: 吉秀亮, 杨君胜, 谢晓媛, 郭学斌. 2021年西宁市公共场所健康危害因素监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(10): 731-735, 756. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.10.005
    JI Xiu-liang, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Xiao-yuan, GUO Xue-bin. Analysis of the monitoring results of health hazards in public places of Xining, China, 2021[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(10): 731-735, 756. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.10.005
    Citation: JI Xiu-liang, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Xiao-yuan, GUO Xue-bin. Analysis of the monitoring results of health hazards in public places of Xining, China, 2021[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(10): 731-735, 756. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.10.005

    2021年西宁市公共场所健康危害因素监测结果分析

    Analysis of the monitoring results of health hazards in public places of Xining, China, 2021

    • 摘要:
      目的 通过开展西宁市公共场所健康危害因素监测,掌握公共场所存在的健康风险,为相关部门采取针对性的措施提供科学依据。
      方法 2021年对西宁市6类公共场所物理因素、室内空气、公共用品用具样品进行卫生监测,按照《公共场所卫生指标及限值要求》(GB 37488-2019)进行结果评价。
      结果 2021年对西宁市宾馆、理发店、美容店、商场超市、沐浴场所、候车室6类47家公共场所开展健康危害因素监测,共抽检样本2 399份,2 046份合格,合格率85.29%;各类公共场所样品合格率差异有统计学意义(χ2=106.02,P < 0.05),沐浴场所、商场超市样品合格率最低,分别为74.66%、74.76%。公共场所主要不合格指标为噪声和湿度,合格率分别为38.82%和47.65%。各类公共场所噪声合格率差异有统计学意义(χ2 =46.63,P < 0.05),商场超市合格率(2.38%)最低。
      结论 西宁市公共场所存在健康风险,商场超市、沐浴场所样品合格率较低,主要不合格指标为湿度和噪声,建议相关部门加强公共场所监管,并采取针对性防护措施。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To understand the health risks in public places through the monitoring of health hazards in public places of Xining, China, and to provide a scientific basis for relevant departments to take targeted measures.
      Methods Samples of the physical factors, indoor air, and public articles were monitored in six types of public places in Xining in 2021, and the results were evaluated based on the Hygienic Indicators and Limits for Public Places (GB 37488-2019).
      Results In 2021, the monitoring of health hazards was conducted for 47 public places in Xining, belonging to the six types of hotels, barber shops, beauty shops, shopping malls (supermarkets), bath places, and waiting rooms. A total of 2 399 samples were collected, among which 2046 samples were qualified, with a qualified rate of 85.29%. There was a significant difference in the qualified rates of samples between the different types of public places (χ2=106.02, P < 0.05), and bathing places and shopping malls (supermarkets) had relatively low qualified rates of 74.66% and 74.76%, respectively. Noise and humidity were the main unqualified indicators in public places and had qualified rates of 38.82% and 47.65%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the qualified rates of noise in various public places (χ2=46.63, P < 0.05), with the lowest qualified rate of 2.38% for shopping malls (supermarkets).
      Conclusion There are health risks in the public places in Xining, and samples from shopping malls (supermarkets) and bathing places have relatively low qualified rates. Humidity and noise are the main unqualified indicators. It is suggested that relevant departments strengthen the supervision of public places and take targeted protective measures.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回