黄冬娟, 顾小利, 潘榕, 谢昌平, 叶绍燕. 柳州市公共场所室内PM2.5和PM10污染及其与室外污染的关系[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(7): 505-509. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.07.006
    引用本文: 黄冬娟, 顾小利, 潘榕, 谢昌平, 叶绍燕. 柳州市公共场所室内PM2.5和PM10污染及其与室外污染的关系[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(7): 505-509. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.07.006
    HUANG Dong-juan, GU Xiao-li, PAN Rong, XIE Chang-ping, YE Shao-yan. Indoor PM2.5 and PM10 pollution and their relationship with outdoor pollution in Liuzhou City[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(7): 505-509. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.07.006
    Citation: HUANG Dong-juan, GU Xiao-li, PAN Rong, XIE Chang-ping, YE Shao-yan. Indoor PM2.5 and PM10 pollution and their relationship with outdoor pollution in Liuzhou City[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(7): 505-509. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.07.006

    柳州市公共场所室内PM2.5和PM10污染及其与室外污染的关系

    Indoor PM2.5 and PM10 pollution and their relationship with outdoor pollution in Liuzhou City

    • 摘要:
      目的 了解柳州市公共场所室内PM2.5与PM10污染状况,分析其室内外PM2.5与PM10污染的相关性。
      方法 于2020年夏季、冬季采用分层随机抽样方法抽取18家住宿场所、8家沐浴场所、6家游泳场所、16家美容美发场所、2家候车场所进行监测.采用光散射法同时测定室内、外PM2.5与PM10质量浓度,同时记录现场采样时监测点的通风状态及特殊情况。
      结果 柳州市公共场所室内PM2.5质量浓度中位数MP25P75)为25(18,37)μg/m,范围为(5~168)μg/m,合格率为92.9%;PM10质量浓度中位数MP25P75)为51(36~79)μg/m,范围为(10~374)μg/m,合格率为92.9%。公共场所冬季室内PM2.5和PM10质量浓度明显高于夏季,差异有统计学意义。不同类型的公共场所室内PM2.5、PM10的质量浓度存在差异。室内PM2.5质量浓度与PM10存在线性相关,回归方程:y=2.083x-0.985,R=0.997;室内PM2.5浓度低于同时期室外实测水平,呈高度正相关(R=0.821)。室内PM10质量浓度与室外水平呈正相关(R=0.790)。PM2.5和PM10室内、外的I/O比值分别为1.02和1.01。
      结论 柳州市公共场所室内空气PM2.5与PM10状况良好。公共场所室内具有良好的通风换气,室内PM2.5、PM10污染主要受室外污染的影响。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the pollution status of indoor PM2.5 and PM10 at public places in Liuzhou, China and to analyze their relationship with outdoor pollution.
      Methods In the summer and winter of 2020, the stratified random sampling method were performed to select 18 accommodation places, 8 bathing places, 6 swimming places, 16 beauty salons, and 2 waiting places for monitoring. Indoor and outdoor PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentration were simultaneously measured by light scattering method. The ventilation status and special conditions of the monitoring points during the on-site sampling were recorded at the same time.
      Results The median mass concentration M(P25, P75) of indoor PM2.5 in liuzhou public places was 25 (18-37) μg/m3, with a range of (5-168) μg/m3, and the qualified rate was 92.9%. The median mass concentration M(P25, P75) of PM10 was 51 (36-79) μg/m3, with a range of (10-374) μg/m3, and the qualified rate was 92.9%. The indoor PM2.5and PM10 mass concentrations in public places in winter were significantly higher than those in summer, with a statistically significant difference. The mass concentrations of indoor PM2.5and PM10 varied in different types of public places. There was a linear relationship between the mass concentration of indoor PM2.5 and PM10, with a regression equation of y=2.083x-0.985, R=0.997;The mass concentration of indoor PM2.5 was lower than that of outdoor PM2.5, and existed a highly positive correlation between them(R=0.821). There was a positive correlation of PM10 mass concentration between indoor and outdoor (R=0.790). The indoor and outdoor I/O ratios of PM2.5 and PM10 were 1.02 and 1.01 respectively.
      Conclusion There are good conditions of indoor air PM2.5 and PM10 in public places in Liuzhou. Public places have good indoor ventilation, and indoor PM2.5 and PM10 pollution is mainly affected by outdoor pollution.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回