熊传龙, 陈志健, 王志强, 何祖安, 何英华, 杨鸿宾, 徐夷, 李洪兴, 王丽, 候蓉蓉, 张荣. 中国5省农村地区饮用水消毒前后菌落总数对比分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(5): 372-377. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.05.009
    引用本文: 熊传龙, 陈志健, 王志强, 何祖安, 何英华, 杨鸿宾, 徐夷, 李洪兴, 王丽, 候蓉蓉, 张荣. 中国5省农村地区饮用水消毒前后菌落总数对比分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(5): 372-377. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.05.009
    XIONG Chuan-long, CHEN Zhi-jian, WANG Zhi-qiang, HE Zu-an, HE Ying-hua, YANG Hong-bin, XU Yi, LI Hong-xing, WANG Li, HOU Rong-rong, ZHANG Rong. Comparative analysis of total bacterial count in drinking water before and after disinfection in rural areas of five provinces in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(5): 372-377. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.05.009
    Citation: XIONG Chuan-long, CHEN Zhi-jian, WANG Zhi-qiang, HE Zu-an, HE Ying-hua, YANG Hong-bin, XU Yi, LI Hong-xing, WANG Li, HOU Rong-rong, ZHANG Rong. Comparative analysis of total bacterial count in drinking water before and after disinfection in rural areas of five provinces in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(5): 372-377. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.05.009

    中国5省农村地区饮用水消毒前后菌落总数对比分析

    Comparative analysis of total bacterial count in drinking water before and after disinfection in rural areas of five provinces in China

    • 摘要:
      目的 对比分析农村地区饮用水消毒前后菌落总数变化情况, 评价饮用水消毒质量和效果。
      方法 在5个省份7个县按照有无消毒及微生物污染随机选择14处采取消毒和14处不采取消毒的水厂, 每间隔约12天检测水源水、出厂水、末梢水菌落总数, 消毒水厂检测出厂水和末梢水消毒剂余量, 全年各检测15次。采用中位数检验、Krushal-Wallis检验和χ2检验分别比较水源水、出厂水、末梢水三者之间菌落总数中位数、检出数和超标率的差异。
      结果 1 182份水源水、出厂水和末梢水菌落总数的M(P25, P75)分别为100(26, 147)、33(5, 130)和55(5, 140) CFU/mL, 三者之间菌落总数的中位数差异具有统计学意义(χ2=43.65, P < 0.001)。当出厂水和末梢水消毒剂余量均达标时, 水源水、出厂水和末梢水菌落总数中位数分别为91(47, 142)、7(2, 23)和10(3, 38) CFU/mL, 出厂水菌落总数中位数与水源水相比(χ2=89.50)、末梢水与水源水相比(χ2=71.32)差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.001);水源水、出厂水和末梢水菌落总数超标率分别为44.4%、2.3%、6.0%, 出厂水菌落总数超标率与水源水相比(χ2=65.95)、末梢水与水源水相比(χ2=51.89)差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001);出厂水菌落总数检出数较水源水下降91%(变化率), 末梢水较水源水下降88%、末梢水较出厂水上升50%, 三者之间菌落总数变化率的差异具有统计学意义(χ2=129.74, P < 0.001)。当水厂不消毒或消毒剂余量不达标时, 出厂水、末梢水和水源水之间菌落总数中位数、超标率的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05), 出厂水与水源水、末梢水与水源水、末梢水与出厂水相比菌落总数变化率均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论 消毒能有效降低饮用水中微生物数量, 饮用水消毒是提高农村居民供水安全有效措施之一。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare the total bacterial count in drinking water before and after disinfection in rural areas, and to evaluate the quality and effect of drinking water disinfection.
      Methods Based on the use of disinfection and the presence of microbial contamination, 14 each of water plants with and without disinfection were randomly selected in 7 counties of 5 provinces in China. The total bacterial count of source, finished, and tap water samples from water plants with nondisinfection, as well as the disinfectant residual in finished and tap water samples from water plants with disinfection, were determined every other 12 days (a total of 15 determinations of each kind of water plants per year). The differences in median bacterial count, detection count and over standard rates among source, finished, and tap water samples were compared by the median test, Krushal-Wallis test, and χ2 test, respectively.
      Results The M (P25, P75) of 1 182 source, finished, and tap water samples were 100 (26, 147), 33 (5, 130) and 55 (5, 140) CFU/mL, respectively. The medians of total bacterial count were significantly different (χ2 = 43.65, P < 0.001). When residual disinfectant in finished and tap water samples complied with the standard, the M (P25, P75) of source, finished, and tap water samples were 91 (47, 142), 7 (2, 23) and 10 (3, 38)CFU/mL, respectively. The median of total bacterial count was significantly different between finished and source water samples (χ2 = 89.50, P < 0.001) and between tap and source water samples (χ2 = 71.3, P < 0.001). The over standard rates of total bacterial count of source, finished, and tap water samples were 44.4%, 2.3% and 6.0%, respectively. The over standard rates were significantly different between finished and source water samples (χ2 = 65.95, P < 0.001) and between tap and source water samples (χ2 = 51.89, P < 0.001). The total bacterial count decreased by 91% in finished water and by 88% in tap water compared with source water. The total bacterial count increased by 50% in tap water compared with finished water. The changes in total bacterial count were significantly different among the three types of water (χ2 = 129.74, P < 0.001). When water was not disinfected or residual disinfectant did not comply with the standard, the median total bacterial count and over standard rates were not significantly different among source, finished, and tap water samples (P>0.05). The change in total bacterial count was not significantly different between finished and source water samples, tap and source water samples, and tap and finished water samples (P>0.05).
      Conclusion Disinfection can effectively reduce the number of microorganisms in drinking water. Drinking water disinfection is one of the effective measures to improve the safety of water supply for rural residents.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回