李晶晶, 林强, 杨超, 王佳, 李美丽, 侯瀚然, 张淼. 2016—2019年北京市延庆区农村生活饮用水监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(2): 141-145. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.02.012
    引用本文: 李晶晶, 林强, 杨超, 王佳, 李美丽, 侯瀚然, 张淼. 2016—2019年北京市延庆区农村生活饮用水监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(2): 141-145. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.02.012
    LI Jing-jing, LIN Qiang, YANG Chao, WANG Jia, LI Mei-li, HOU Han-ran, ZHANG Miao. An analysis of monitoring results of rural drinking water quality in Yanqing District, Beijing, China, 2016-2019[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(2): 141-145. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.02.012
    Citation: LI Jing-jing, LIN Qiang, YANG Chao, WANG Jia, LI Mei-li, HOU Han-ran, ZHANG Miao. An analysis of monitoring results of rural drinking water quality in Yanqing District, Beijing, China, 2016-2019[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2022, 12(2): 141-145. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2022.02.012

    2016—2019年北京市延庆区农村生活饮用水监测结果分析

    An analysis of monitoring results of rural drinking water quality in Yanqing District, Beijing, China, 2016-2019

    • 摘要:
      目的 分析延庆区2016-2019年农村生活饮用水卫生状况和健康风险因素,为相关部门决策提供科学依据和技术支持。
      方法 2016-2019年对延庆区15个乡镇30个监测点开展现场调查工作,采集枯水期和丰水期农村生活饮用水水样。按照《生活饮用水标准检验方法》(GB/T 5750-2006)进行水质检验。依据《生活饮用水卫生标准》(GB 5749-2006)对检测结果进行卫生安全性评价,不同分组合格率比较采用χ2检验。
      结果 2016-2019年共采集并检测水样480份,水样合格率为61.0%(293/480)。不同年份、不同水期、不同水样类型、不同水处理方式以及消毒设备不同使用情况水样合格率差异具有统计学意义(χ2分别为42.36、14.73、1.97、356.54和217.32,P < 0.05)。水样中铁、挥发性酚、铬(六价)、氟化物、硝酸盐、总大肠菌群和大肠埃希氏菌7项指标超出标准限值,其中总大肠菌群不合格率最高(34.6%),其次为大肠埃希氏菌(5.4%)和硝酸盐(5.0%),其余4项指标不合格率均低于5%。
      结论 延庆区农村生活饮用水质量亟待提高,需重点关注总大肠菌群、大肠埃希氏菌、硝酸盐和铁等不合格指标,对其潜在的健康风险引起重视,以保障农村饮水卫生安全。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To analyze the sanitary condition and health risk factors of rural drinking water in Yanqing District, Beijing, China from 2016 to 2019, and to provide a scientific basis and technical support for the decision-making by relevant departments.
      Methods From 2016 to 2019, field surveys were conducted at 30 monitoring sites in 15 townships in Yanqing District, and rural drinking water samples were collected in dry and wet seasons. The water quality was tested in accordance with the Standard Examination Method for Drinking Water (GB/T 5750-2006) and the sanitation and safety were evaluated according to the Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749-2006). The chi-square test was used to compare the qualification rates among different groups.
      Results A total of 480 water samples were collected and examined from 2016 to 2019, with a qualification rate of 61.0% (293/480). There were significant differences in the qualification rates of water samples among different years, different seasons, different types of water samples, different ways of water treatment, and different usages of disinfection equipment (χ2 were 42.36, 14.73, 1.97, 356.54, and 217.32, respectively, P < 0.05). Seven indicators, including iron, volatile phenol, chromium (Ⅵ), fluoride, nitrates, total coliforms, and Escherichia coli, in the water samples exceeded standard limits, among which total coliforms had the highest rate of failing to reach the standard (34.6%), followed by Escherichia coli (5.4%) and nitrates (5.0%), and the other four indicators had unqualified rates less than 5%.
      Conclusion The quality of rural drinking water in Yanqing District needs to be improved urgently. It is necessary to pay special attention to the indicators failing to reach the standards, such as total coliforms, Escherichia coli, nitrates, and iron, and attach importance to the potential health risks, thus ensuring the sanitation and safety of rural drinking water.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回