陈建义, 谢林伸, 朱婷婷, 邓臣, 欧蕾. 三类水体中7种有机磷农药国标测试方法的整合优化[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2020, 10(6): 597-601. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.015
    引用本文: 陈建义, 谢林伸, 朱婷婷, 邓臣, 欧蕾. 三类水体中7种有机磷农药国标测试方法的整合优化[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2020, 10(6): 597-601. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.015
    CHEN Jianyi, XIE Linshen, ZHU Tingting, DENG Chen, OU Lei. Consolidation of the National Standard Examination Methods for Determination of 7 Organophosphorus Pesticides in Three kinds of Water Samples[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2020, 10(6): 597-601. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.015
    Citation: CHEN Jianyi, XIE Linshen, ZHU Tingting, DENG Chen, OU Lei. Consolidation of the National Standard Examination Methods for Determination of 7 Organophosphorus Pesticides in Three kinds of Water Samples[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2020, 10(6): 597-601. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.015

    三类水体中7种有机磷农药国标测试方法的整合优化

    Consolidation of the National Standard Examination Methods for Determination of 7 Organophosphorus Pesticides in Three kinds of Water Samples

    • 摘要:
      目的 在现有国标的基础上,对生活饮用水、地表水和工业废水三类不同水体中的敌敌畏、甲拌磷、内吸磷、乐果、甲基对硫磷、马拉硫磷和对硫磷的方法进行整合优化,形成一种通用且更为优化的测定方法。
      方法 采用液液萃取方法,优化仪器参数达到更低的检出限和测定下限;通过对不同水体(生活饮用水、地表水和工业废水)的加标实验确证方法的适用性,气相色谱-增强版火焰光度检测器(GC-FPD+)进行定性定量分析。
      结果 7种有机磷农药在15 min内完全分离,在(5~250)μg/L的浓度范围内呈现良好的线性关系,测定下限可以达到(0.01~0.03)μg/L;在三类不同水样中加标实验计算出加标回收率在80.7%~107.9%之间,相对标准偏差 < 10%。
      结论 该方法在三类不同水体(生活饮用水、地表水和工业废水)的测试中,前处理流程使用更少的样品量和有机试剂,7种有机磷农药测定下限远低于现有国标《生活饮用水标准检验方法农药指标》(GB/T 5750.9-2006)和《水质有机磷农药的测定气相色谱法》(GB 13192-1991)2,分离度良好,灵敏度高,准确度和精密度好,其中内吸磷的定性定量包含其两种异构体,该方法适用于三类不同水体中7种有机磷农药的测定。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To develop a universal and more optimized examination method based on the national standard methods by consolidating and optimizing the current methods used for determination of dichlorvos, phorate, demeton, dimethoate, parathion-methyl, malathion, and parathion in three different kinds of water samples (drinking water, surface water, and industrial wastewater).
      Methods Liquid-liquid extraction was used to pretreat water sampies and the instrumental parameters were optimized to achieve lower detection limits and lower determination limits. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed using enhanced gas chromatography-flame photometric detector (GC-FPD+) based on the suitability of the spike test confirmatory method for the three kinds of water.
      Results Seven types of organophosphorus pesticides were completely separated within 15 min, showing a good linear relationship within the concentration range of (5~250) μg/L and determination limits of (0.01~0.03) μg/L. The spike and recovery rates were from 80.7% to 107.9% with relative standard deviations of less than 10% in the spike tests conducted using the three types of water samples.
      Conclusion This method uses a small amount of samples and organic reagents during the pretreatment process for testing the three kinds of water samples. The determination limits of the seven types of organophosphorus pesticides are significantly lower than those of Standard examination methods for drinking water-Pesticides parameters(GB/T 5750. 9-2006) and Water quality-Determination of organic phosphorous pesticide in water-Gas chromatography(GB 13192-1991), with good resolution as well as high sensitivity, accuracy, and precision, while the qualitative and quantitative analyses of demeton involves the consideration of its two isomers. This method is suitable for examining seven organophosphorus pesticides in three different types of water.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回