孙利文, 张明清, 朱婷婷, 贾蕾, 张武力. 北京市新发地新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对怀柔区疫情防控形势的影响[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2020, 10(6): 544-548. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.005
    引用本文: 孙利文, 张明清, 朱婷婷, 贾蕾, 张武力. 北京市新发地新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对怀柔区疫情防控形势的影响[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2020, 10(6): 544-548. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.005
    SUN Liwen, ZHANG Mingqing, ZHU Tingting, JIA Lei, ZHANG Wuli. Effect of COVID-19 Outbreak in Xinfadi Market on the Epidemic Situation in Huairou District of Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2020, 10(6): 544-548. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.005
    Citation: SUN Liwen, ZHANG Mingqing, ZHU Tingting, JIA Lei, ZHANG Wuli. Effect of COVID-19 Outbreak in Xinfadi Market on the Epidemic Situation in Huairou District of Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2020, 10(6): 544-548. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.06.005

    北京市新发地新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对怀柔区疫情防控形势的影响

    Effect of COVID-19 Outbreak in Xinfadi Market on the Epidemic Situation in Huairou District of Beijing, China

    • 摘要: 北京市新发地COVID-19疫情以较快的速度传播,在相关的连锁市场、餐馆及社区,形成较多的疫点,并在家庭、单位发生多起聚集性疫情。怀柔区时为低风险区,但不排除外区病例输入造成社区传播、家庭和聚集性疫情发生的风险,存在五大输入性风险:一是辖区各单位商务往来、通勤往返等人群流动性因素存在输入风险;二是公交、旅游景区、休闲场所相关行业人员存在感染风险,并且相关环境可能出现被污染情况,输入风险持续存在;三是患者往返于区内、区外医疗机构就医存在区外感染病例输入传播的可能性;四是医疗机构发热门诊、实验室检测及支援高风险地区疫情防控等医务人员在接诊、采样、检验过程中存在暴露污染环境的风险;五是在上述感染风险存在的情况下,被感染者无症状或有症状不及时就医的情况,不能实现早发现、早治疗、早隔离等措施,造成社区传播风险性仍然存在。怀柔区输入性疫情风险客观存在,需密切关注新发地疫情动向,通过采取包括加强人群分类管理、强化公共场所分级管理、持续开展爱国卫生运动,以及倡导健康行为方式等综合措施以降低疫情输入和扩散的风险。

       

      Abstract: The epidemic in Xinfadi Market spreaded rapidly, which formed multiple epidemic spots in related market chains, restaurants, and communities, and resulted in multiple cluster outbreaks in households and workplaces. Huairou District was rated as a low-risk area, but there was still a risk of community-based transmission and household-based or cluster outbreaks due to imported cases from other districts. The five major risks of imported epidemic were as follows: first, business exchanges between the institutions within the local government's jurisdiction and population mobility factors such as commuting may pose an importing risk; second, people working in the public transport industry, scenic spots, and leisure places had a risk of being infected, and relevant environments may be polluted, thus posing a persistent importing risk; third, there was a possibility of transmission by imported cases who came from other districts and sought medical assistance in the medical institutions within Huairou District; fourth, medical staff working in fever clinics and laboratories and those supporting the prevention and control of epidemic in high-risk areas had a risk of exposure to polluted environments in the processes of receiving and treating patients, sampling, and testing samples; fifth, in the presence of the above-mentioned risks of infection, if infected persons were asymptomatic or failed to seek medical assistance in time, it would be impossible to achieve the aim of early detection, early treatment, and early isolation, thus resulting in community-based transmission. There are objective risks for imported epidemic. Close attention should be paid to the epidemic trend in Xinfadi Market; Meanwhile, comprehensive measures including enhancing classified management of various populations and graded management of public places, continuously carrying on patriotic public health campaign, and promoting healthy behavior should be adopted to reduce the risk of importing and transmitting epidemic.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回