杨双凤, 吴传城, 刘宝英, 李煌元, 张文昌, 姜雨. 预防医学本科生基本能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2020, 10(4): 346-350, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.04.003
    引用本文: 杨双凤, 吴传城, 刘宝英, 李煌元, 张文昌, 姜雨. 预防医学本科生基本能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2020, 10(4): 346-350, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.04.003
    YANG Shuangfeng, WU Chuancheng, LIU Baoying, LI Huangyuan, ZHANG Wenchang, JIANG Yu. Establishment of Evaluation Index System for Basic Capabilities of Undergraduates in Preventive Medicine[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2020, 10(4): 346-350, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.04.003
    Citation: YANG Shuangfeng, WU Chuancheng, LIU Baoying, LI Huangyuan, ZHANG Wenchang, JIANG Yu. Establishment of Evaluation Index System for Basic Capabilities of Undergraduates in Preventive Medicine[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2020, 10(4): 346-350, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2020.04.003

    预防医学本科生基本能力评价指标体系构建

    Establishment of Evaluation Index System for Basic Capabilities of Undergraduates in Preventive Medicine

    • 摘要:
      目的 构建一套预防医学本科毕业生基本能力评价指标体系。
      方法 采用国内外文献回顾、专家访谈、专题小组讨论等研究方法,构建预防医学本科毕业生基本能力评价指标体系。遴选出24位专家对该体系进行两轮德尔菲专家咨询调查以确定三级指标体系,采用专家权重法和层次分析法确定其权重。
      结果 专家咨询的积极系数大于80%,权威系数大于0.7,均值为0.906,最终确定的指标体系由8个一级指标,22个二级指标,61个三级指标构成。
      结论 该评价指标体系可为预防医学人才培养和教学改革提供参考。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To establish an evaluation index system for the basic capabilities of undergraduates in preventive medicine.
      Methods An evaluation index system for the basic capabilities of undergraduates in preventive medicine was established by the method including literature review of related articles in China and foreign countries, expert interview, and special group discussions. A total of 24 experts were selected to conduct two rounds of Delphi expert consultation on the system to finally determine the index system and its weight.
      Results Expert consultation had a positive coefficient of more than 80% and an authoritative coefficient of greater than 0.7, with a mean value of 0.906. The final index system consisted of 8 first-level indices, 22 second-level indices, and 61 third-level indices.
      Conclusion This evaluation index system can provide a reference for talent cultivation and teaching reform in preventive medicine.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回