代华, 张开菊, 江美琴, 晏云富, 蒋家俊, 李家伟, 邓宪川, 桂莉, 胡腊生. 2017—2018年贵阳市农村生活垃圾及污水处理状况调查[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2019, 9(4): 349-352, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2019.04.008
    引用本文: 代华, 张开菊, 江美琴, 晏云富, 蒋家俊, 李家伟, 邓宪川, 桂莉, 胡腊生. 2017—2018年贵阳市农村生活垃圾及污水处理状况调查[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2019, 9(4): 349-352, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2019.04.008
    DAI Hua, ZHANG Kaiju, JIANG Meiqin, YAN Yunfu, JIANG Jiajun, LI Jiawei, DENG Xianchuan, GUI Li, HU Lasheng. Investigation of Garbage and Sewage Treatments in Guiyang Rural Areas in 2017—2018[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2019, 9(4): 349-352, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2019.04.008
    Citation: DAI Hua, ZHANG Kaiju, JIANG Meiqin, YAN Yunfu, JIANG Jiajun, LI Jiawei, DENG Xianchuan, GUI Li, HU Lasheng. Investigation of Garbage and Sewage Treatments in Guiyang Rural Areas in 2017—2018[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2019, 9(4): 349-352, 357. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2019.04.008

    2017—2018年贵阳市农村生活垃圾及污水处理状况调查

    Investigation of Garbage and Sewage Treatments in Guiyang Rural Areas in 2017—2018

    • 摘要:
      目的 掌握贵阳市农村环境卫生健康危害因素水平及动态变化,评价贵阳市农村环境卫生状况。
      方法 选取3个监测县,采用分层随机抽样抽取60个行政村、300户家庭作为监测户开展环境卫生调查,通过查阅资料、访谈及现场观察等方法收集数据。
      结果 3个监测县总人口占贵阳市总人口21.5%,与2017年相比,2018年监测村随意堆放生活垃圾所占比例下降了3.3%,处理方式仍以填埋为主,但填埋处理量较2017年下降了15.0%;2018年监测村随意排放生活污水占50.0%,排放地点主要以农田和坑塘为主,分别占35.0%和28.3%;生产性工业污水和养殖业污水随意排放分别占50.0%和87.1%;15%监测村无环境卫生经费投入,2018年除蝇、除蚊和除蟑螂的监测村所占比例约30.0%。
      结论 贵阳市农村生活垃圾、生活污水的处理现状总体呈改善态势,但与发达地区农村环境卫生相比仍存在差距,亟需加强农村环境基础设施建设,采取有效措施予以改善。

       

      Abstract:
      Objectives To master the level and dynamic changes of rural environmental health risk factors in Guiyang, and objectively evaluate the environmental health status of rural areas in Guiyang.
      Methods Three monitoring counties were selected, and 60 administrative villages and 300 households were stratified randomly selected as monitoring households to carry out on-site investigation of environmental health. Data were collected through data access, interviews, on-site observation.
      Results The total population of the three monitoring counties accounted for 21.5% of the total population of Guiyang, compared with 2017, the proportion of randomly piled household garbage decreased by 3.3%, and the treatment methods was mainly landfill, which was decreased by 15%. In 2018, random discharge of domestic sewage from monitored villages accounted for 50%, and the discharge sites were mainly farmland and pits, which accounted for 35% and 28.3%, respectively. The random discharge of productive industrial sewage and aquacultural sewage accounted for 50% and 87.1%, respectively. Fifteen percent of monitoring villages had no fund input on environmental health. In 2018, the proportions of monitoring villages that eliminate flies, mosquitoes, and cockroaches were all less than 30%.
      Conclusions The status of rural domestic garbage and sewage treatments in Guiyang have generally improved, but there is still a gap between rural environmental health in Guiyang and those in developed areas. Therefore, it is urgent to strengthen the establishment of rural environmental infrastructures and take effective measures to improve them.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回