王璐瑶, 段链, 赵康峰, 顾雯, 李毅民. 海水淡化阻垢剂遗传毒性试验观察[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2018, 8(4): 330-334. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.04.010
    引用本文: 王璐瑶, 段链, 赵康峰, 顾雯, 李毅民. 海水淡化阻垢剂遗传毒性试验观察[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2018, 8(4): 330-334. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.04.010
    WANG Luyao, DUAN Lian, ZHAO Kangfeng, GU Wen, Li Yimin. Experimental Observation on Genotoxicity of Antiscalants Used in Desalination of Seawater[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2018, 8(4): 330-334. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.04.010
    Citation: WANG Luyao, DUAN Lian, ZHAO Kangfeng, GU Wen, Li Yimin. Experimental Observation on Genotoxicity of Antiscalants Used in Desalination of Seawater[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2018, 8(4): 330-334. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.04.010

    海水淡化阻垢剂遗传毒性试验观察

    Experimental Observation on Genotoxicity of Antiscalants Used in Desalination of Seawater

    • 摘要:
      目的 用体外彗星试验和流式细胞术体外微核试验检测不同海水淡化阻垢剂作用于CHO细胞的遗传毒性效应。
      方法 改性聚羧酸阻垢剂、聚丙烯酸阻垢剂(DM101)和马来酸阻垢剂3种阻垢剂的IC50值分别为2.781、2.401和1.347 mg/mL,将不同阻垢剂的IC50值作为试验的最高剂量。高、中、低不同剂量的3种阻垢剂分别处理CHO-K1细胞3 h,以浓度为1 μg/mL的K2Cr2O7为阳性对照组,以尾部DNA百分比(tail DNA%)和尾距(tail moment)作为DNA损伤的指标;3种阻垢剂流式细胞术体外微核试验分为高、中、低三个剂量组,试验分为+S9短时处理组(0.1 μg/mL环磷酰胺和1 μg/mL秋水仙碱作为阳性对照)和-S9持续处理组(0.1 μg/mL丝裂霉素C和0.1 μg/mL秋水仙碱作为阳性对照),采用EMA和SYTOX green双色标记,流式细胞仪分析微核率。
      结果 与阴性对照组相比,3种阻垢剂的尾部DNA百分比和尾距在高、中剂量组的浓度上均出现统计学显著性差异。与阴性对照组相比,在-S9的条件下,马来酸聚合物阻垢剂高剂量组试验结果为阳性;在+S9的条件下,马来酸聚合物阻垢剂在高、中和低剂量组实验结果为阳性,聚丙烯酸阻垢剂(DM101)和马来酸阻垢剂在高剂量组试验结果为阳性。
      结论 在本试验条件下,3种阻垢剂具有遗传毒性。

       

      Abstract:
      Objectives TTo investigate the genotoxic effect of different antiscalants on CHO cells with an in vitro comet assay and flow cytometry in vitro micronucleus test.
      Methods The IC50 value of three different antiscalants (modified potycarboxytic acid antiscanlant, polyacrylic acid antiscalant and maleic acid antiscalant) were 2.781, 2.401 and 1.347 mg/mL, respectively. The IC50 value of each antiscalant was used as the high dose group. In comet assay, CHO-K1 cells were treated with each antiscalant in different concentrationsfor 3 h, and 1 μg/mL K2Cr2O7 was used as a positive control; tail DNA% and tail moment were used to detect the damage of DNA. In the flow cytometry in vitro micronucleus test, a treatment with and without metabolic activation was included. For the treatment with metabolic activation, CHO cells were treated with each of three antiscalants in different concentrations, in the +S9 treated group, using 0.1 μg/mL cyclophosphamide (CP) and 0.1 μg/mL colchicine as positive control; For the treatment without metabolic activation in the -S9 treated group, using 0.1 μg/mL mitomycin C (MMC) and 0.1 μg/mL colchicine as positive control. A flow cytometric method was used for micronuclear rates of cells labeled by EMA and SYTOX Green.
      Results In comparison with the negative control, the tail DNA% and tail moments in three dose group of three antiscalants were significantly different. In comparison with the negative control, the high dose of modified potycarboxytic acid antiscalant treated without metabolic activation showed a positive result and the high and middle dose of modified potycarboxytic acid antiscanlant and polyacrylic acid antiscalant treated with metabolic activation showed positive result.
      Conclusions Under the present experimental condition, three antiscalants showed genotoxicity.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回