高级检索
    周保松, 李广普, 杨浩杰, 张海云, 莫伟文, 曾德才, 陈刚. 2012—2015年上海某区三类重点公共场所公共用品监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2018, 8(1): 24-28. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.01.005
    引用本文: 周保松, 李广普, 杨浩杰, 张海云, 莫伟文, 曾德才, 陈刚. 2012—2015年上海某区三类重点公共场所公共用品监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2018, 8(1): 24-28. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.01.005
    shu
    ZHOU Baosong, LI Guangpu, YANG Haojie, ZHANG Haiyun, MO Weiwen, ZENG Decai, CHEN Gang. Monitoring Results Analysis on Hygienic Status of Public Articles in Three Key Public Places in a Certain District of Shanghai from 2012 to 2015[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2018, 8(1): 24-28. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.01.005
    Citation: ZHOU Baosong, LI Guangpu, YANG Haojie, ZHANG Haiyun, MO Weiwen, ZENG Decai, CHEN Gang. Monitoring Results Analysis on Hygienic Status of Public Articles in Three Key Public Places in a Certain District of Shanghai from 2012 to 2015[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2018, 8(1): 24-28. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2018.01.005
    shu

    2012—2015年上海某区三类重点公共场所公共用品监测结果分析

    Monitoring Results Analysis on Hygienic Status of Public Articles in Three Key Public Places in a Certain District of Shanghai from 2012 to 2015

      摘要
    • 摘要:
      目的 了解该区住宿、沐浴和美容美发场所公共用品卫生状况和变化趋势，为卫生监管提供参考。
      方法 收集该区2012-2015年公共场所监测数据，运用SPSS 22.0进行统计分析。
      结果 公共用品大类之间的合格率有统计学差异（χ2=51.63，P < 0.005），多重比较显示布草、洁具、杯具和修脚工具间的合格率无统计学差异（P>0.05/10=0.005），但前三类的合格率低于美容美发用具（P < 0.005）；三类场所中仅美容美发场所的公共用品大类间的合格率有统计学差异（χ2=85.91，P < 0.001）；布草和洁具的整体合格率均呈上升的趋势（χ趋2=39.01，P < 0.001；χ趋2=26.43，P < 0.001），布草的合格率在三类场所中均呈上升趋势（χ趋2=7.68，P < 0.006；χ趋2=22.98，P < 0.001；χ趋2=20.76，P < 0.001）。
      结论 公共用品卫生状况不容乐观但呈现一定改善的趋势，仍需加强对部分公共用品进行卫生监测并强化监管措施。

       

      Abstract:
      Objectives To understand the hygienic status of public articles in some hotels, bathing and beauty salons in a certain district of Shanghai from 2012 to 2015, so as to provide guidance for hygienic supervision.
      Methods Monitoring data of three key public places from 2012 to 2015 were collected and analyzed statistically by SPSS 22.0.
      Results The qualified rates of five categories of public articles were significantly different (χ2=51.63, P < 0.005), the multiple comparison results showed no statistical difference among cloth, sanitary ware, glass and pedicure tools (P> 0.05/10=0.005). However, the qualified rates of former three categories were lower than that of hairdressing and beauty tools (P < 0.005); only the qualified rate of beauty salon was significantly different (χ2=85.91, P < 0.001); the qualified rates of cloth and sanitary ware showed a rising trend (χtend2=39.01, P < 0.001; χtend2=26.43, P < 0.001); the qualified rates of cloth in the three types of public place from 2012 to 2015 showed a rising trend (χtend2=7.68, P < 0.006; χtend2=22.98, P < 0.001; χtend2=20.76, P < 0.001).
      Conclusions There are still some problems on the hygienic status of public articles in public places, but an improvement has been shown in some extent. Monitoring the hygienic status of public articles in public places should be strengthened and measures should be taken for further improvement.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(22)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回