黄冬娟, 叶绍燕, 黄运坤. 2016年柳州市公共场所卫生状况分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2017, 7(5): 398-402. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.05.012
    引用本文: 黄冬娟, 叶绍燕, 黄运坤. 2016年柳州市公共场所卫生状况分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2017, 7(5): 398-402. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.05.012
    HUANG Dongjuan, YE Shaoyan, HUANG Yunkun. Sanitary Status of Public Places in Liuzhou City in 2016[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2017, 7(5): 398-402. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.05.012
    Citation: HUANG Dongjuan, YE Shaoyan, HUANG Yunkun. Sanitary Status of Public Places in Liuzhou City in 2016[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2017, 7(5): 398-402. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.05.012

    2016年柳州市公共场所卫生状况分析

    Sanitary Status of Public Places in Liuzhou City in 2016

    • 摘要:
      目的 了解柳州市公共场所卫生质量状况,找出影响其卫生质量的主要因素,为加强公共场所卫生监管提供科学依据。
      方法 依据《公共场所卫生监测技术规范》《公共场所卫生标准检测方法》的要求,对柳州市公共场所进行空气质量和公共卫生用品进行抽样和检测,按照《公共场所卫生标准》进行分析和评价。
      结果 2016年公共场所监测样本共2 554份,其中合格1 837份,总合格率为71.9%,不同类别公共场所总合格率之间差异有统计学意义。公共场所空气中,一氧化碳、甲醛和氨的合格率为100%,合格率最低的监测项目是PM2.5,为15.3%。不同项目监测合格率差异有统计学意义。公共用品用具监测合格率不同,差异有统计学意义。
      结论 柳州市公共场所卫生状况良好,存在一些问题,应进一步加强公共场所的卫生管理力度,提高全市公共场所的卫生水平。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To understand the sanitary quality of public places in Liuzhou city, analyze the main factors that influencing the sanitary quality, and provide the basis for strengthening hygiene supervision and management in public places.
      Methods The sampling and detection method on the quality of air and public articles in Liuzhou city was conducted according to the requirements of the Technical rules of health monitoring for public places and the Hygienic standard test method for public places. The analysis and evaluation were performed according to the Hygienic standards for public places.
      Results A total of 2 554 samples were collected from public places in 2016, in which 1 837 samples were qualified, and the total qualified rate was 71.9%. There was a statistically significant difference on the qualified rate among different types of public places. The qualified rates of carbon monoxide, formaldehyde and ammonia were 100%, while the qualified rate of PM2.5 was the lowest, only 15.3%. The difference on the qualified rate among different compounds in the air in public places was statistically significant. The difference on the qualified rate of monitored public appliances has statistical significance.
      Conclusions In general, the hygienic status of public places was good in Liuzhou city, but problems still existed. The hygiene management and disinfection in public places should be strengthened.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回