高级检索
    蒋励, 张建华, 杜娟, 卢秀娟, 彭西英, 宋小琴, 陈刚, 李洪波, 殷忠. 贵阳市十五家医院候诊室卫生状况调查[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2017, 7(1): 24-27. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.01.004
    引用本文: 蒋励, 张建华, 杜娟, 卢秀娟, 彭西英, 宋小琴, 陈刚, 李洪波, 殷忠. 贵阳市十五家医院候诊室卫生状况调查[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2017, 7(1): 24-27. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.01.004
    shu
    JIANG Li, ZHANG Jianhua, DU Juan, LU Xiujuan, PENG Xiying, SONG Xiaoqin, CHEN Gang, LI Hongbo, YIN Zhong. Air Quality Status in Waiting Room of Fifteen Guiyang Municipal Hospitals[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2017, 7(1): 24-27. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.01.004
    Citation: JIANG Li, ZHANG Jianhua, DU Juan, LU Xiujuan, PENG Xiying, SONG Xiaoqin, CHEN Gang, LI Hongbo, YIN Zhong. Air Quality Status in Waiting Room of Fifteen Guiyang Municipal Hospitals[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2017, 7(1): 24-27. DOI: 10.13421/j.cnki.hjwsxzz.2017.01.004
    shu

    贵阳市十五家医院候诊室卫生状况调查

    Air Quality Status in Waiting Room of Fifteen Guiyang Municipal Hospitals

      摘要
    • 摘要:
      目的  了解贵阳市医院候诊室空气质量状况，为加强医院候诊室监督管理提供科学依据。
      方法  室内空气卫生指标按照《公共场所卫生监测技术规范》(GB/T 17220-1998) 的要求设点采样监测。根据《公共场所卫生标准检验方法》(GB/T 18204-2013) 和《公共场所空气中可吸入颗粒物 (PMl0) 测定方法—光散射法》(WS/T 206-2001) 规定的检验方法进行检测，对监测资料进行分析统计。参照《医院候诊室卫生标准》(GB 9671-1996) 的要求进行结果评价。
      结果  风速、二氧化碳、一氧化碳、甲醛、可吸入颗粒物、照度为全部合格项目; 其中温度合格率为88%，空气菌落总数合格率为82.67%，噪声均为不合格。在所监测的15所医院中，1项指标不合格的有9家，占60%; 2项指标不合格的有4家，占26.67%; 3项指标不合格的有2家，占13.33%。
      结论  贵阳市15所医院候诊室的空气质量状况水平总体较好，但仍存在个别监测指标不达标情况，应加强监督管理和日常监测。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective  To provide scientific basis for strengthening the supervision and management of air quality in the waiting room of hospitals in Guiyang.
      Methods  Sampling and monitoring methods were based on the Technical Specification for Hygienic Monitoring in Public Places (GB/T 17220-1998).Detection methods were based on the Standard Test Method for the Hygienic status in Public Places (GB/T 18204-2013) and the Assay Method for the Determination of Inhalable Particulate Matters (PM10) in the Air of Public Places-Light Scattering Method (WS/T 206-2001).The evaluation was based on the requirement of the Hygienic Standards for Waiting Room in Hospitals (GB 9671-1996), and the monitoring data were analyzed statistically.
      Results  The indicators for wind speed, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, inhalable particulate matters and illumination were qualified. The qualified rate for temperature, bacteria counts was 88% and 82.67%, respectively. Noise was unqualified in all places. Among 15 monitored hospitals, 9 hospitals had only 1 unqualified indicator, accounted for 60%, 4 hospitals had 2 unqualified indicators, accounted for 26.67%; 2 hospitals had 3 unqualified indicators, accounted for 13.33%.
      Conclusions  The air quality in the waiting room of Guiyang municipal hospitals was well overall, but some indicators were exceeding the standard limit to some extent. The supervision, management and daily monitoring should be strengthened.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(10)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回